The Knowledge Accelerator: Big Picture Thinking in Small Pieces

Nathan Hahn·Joseph Chee Chang·Ji Eun Kim
CHI·2016·66 citations🏆 Best Paper Honorable Mention

TLDRThis paper instantiates the idea that a computational system can scaffold an emerging interdependent, big picture view entirely through the small contributions of individuals through a prototype system for accomplishing distributed information synthesis and evaluates its output across a variety of topics.

The Knowledge Accelerator: Big Picture Thinking in Small Pieces

How do people cite this paper?

(generated 20 days ago)

The Knowledge Accelerator has been widely adopted as a reference system for crowd-powered information synthesis and sensemaking — cited as a representative approach for decomposing complex writing and research tasks into manageable microtasks, as a model for workflow design patterns such as vote-then-edit, redundancy, and hybrid crowd-machine pipelines in crowd-writing systems, as an example of how collective contributions can produce coherent, comprehensive summaries comparable to top web sources, and as inspiration for systems that scaffold global understanding from local crowd contributions across domains including collaborative sensemaking, online research, and knowledge reuse.

Loading PDF reader...

The Knowledge Accelerator: Big Picture Thinking in Small Pieces

Nathan Hahn·Joseph Chee Chang·Ji Eun Kim
CHI·2016·66 citations🏆 Best Paper Honorable Mention

TLDRThis paper instantiates the idea that a computational system can scaffold an emerging interdependent, big picture view entirely through the small contributions of individuals through a prototype system for accomplishing distributed information synthesis and evaluates its output across a variety of topics.

The Knowledge Accelerator: Big Picture Thinking in Small Pieces

How do people cite this paper?

(generated 20 days ago)

The Knowledge Accelerator has been widely adopted as a reference system for crowd-powered information synthesis and sensemaking — cited as a representative approach for decomposing complex writing and research tasks into manageable microtasks, as a model for workflow design patterns such as vote-then-edit, redundancy, and hybrid crowd-machine pipelines in crowd-writing systems, as an example of how collective contributions can produce coherent, comprehensive summaries comparable to top web sources, and as inspiration for systems that scaffold global understanding from local crowd contributions across domains including collaborative sensemaking, online research, and knowledge reuse.

Paper

Loading PDF reader...